Stonehenge Glyph
first discovered in 1995 by Beyond Boundaries
first discovered in 1995 by Beyond Boundaries
We recently received this letter from, Crik, questioning the validity of the Montreal UFO Photos we received a few months back. Please let us know what you think. E-mail Joyce Murphy with your thoughts.
Joyce,
I have problems with your Montreal Photos.
1/ One does not just turn a camera lens toward the sun and snap a picture. The diaphragm does not close that small especially with the fast films normally loaded in today's cameras. Therefore special equipment would have had to be present thereby raising questions about the validity of the sighting.
2/ If we accept that such a picture could be made, the shadow is on the wrong side of the object. At any angle from the Sun the shadow is not likely to be on the side near the Sun.
3/ If we still want to accept the pictures as real then we probably should consider the object not as mass but as a void in space, for example, a portal. Such opinion would be backed up by the "presence of sparks".
I have already, some time back, suggested to the Millennium Group that the objects being seen in the vicinity of the Sun may more likely be portals in Space-time rather than objects. Even when seemingly behind the Sun there are no reflections, at least in photos I have seen. On the near side there should be some reflections on the edge nearest the Sun.
Such portals, with their resultant effects on the gravitational, magnetic and electrical fields could be causing the current sunspots and flares of the Sun and may have been doing so all along. We just haven't been able to see the portals, if that is what they are. All serious study in the past, far as I know, has been with projected images on a plate and probably not sensitive enough in the glare to view objects close to the Sun, especially since no one thought there could be anything that close to the Sun.
—Crik
—
NOTICE: Articles and Reports on the Beyond Boundaries Archive web site were first published on the Internet or in the Newsletter from July 1996 through June 2000. Since these are reprints of the original stories, names, addresses, email addresses and web links may be out of date or may have been changed. The opinions expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of Beyond Boundaries, Inc., its advertisers, or associates.
